Bonjourrrrrrrrr, yah cheese-eatin' surrender monkeys!
Ryan Sager writes:
Comfort and headroom are two variables that seem to be disregarded by efficiency-seeking car buyers. So, if you can afford it, why not have the best of both worlds?
(h/t The Daily Dish)
I've never met an SUV owner whose personal sense of self suffered because their "other car" was not a Prius. From my experience, the ownership is based on usefulness: An SUV is useful for comfortably transporting a family of four, a dog, and luggage. Because the Prius is most efficient when stopping-and-going, it's useful for short distance trips such as running to the food store and taking the kids to the park.Chance a U.S. household that owns a Prius also owns an SUV: 1 in 3.That’s from the Harper’s Index, October issue, according to Cowen. It would surprise you, if you didn’t read this blog and already know that we’re constantly calculating the trade-off between being able to see ourselves as good people and the cost of engaging in all that non-advantageous goodness.
Comfort and headroom are two variables that seem to be disregarded by efficiency-seeking car buyers. So, if you can afford it, why not have the best of both worlds?
(h/t The Daily Dish)
Comments